Unnamed Source Doesn’t Equal Truth

“Insider” reporting of facts, provided the source’s name is not released immediately means there is no verifiable validity to the “facts”. Of course, if they support your view of the person, group, company, or government then they are the real facts.

What do you blindly accept as fact? Do any two eyewitnesses ever agree on what happened?

Posted from Blogium for iPhone

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s