Unnamed Source Doesn’t Equal Truth

“Insider” reporting of facts, provided the source’s name is not released immediately means there is no verifiable validity to the “facts”. Of course, if they support your view of the person, group, company, or government then they are the real facts.

What do you blindly accept as fact? Do any two eyewitnesses ever agree on what happened?

Posted from Blogium for iPhone

Washington DC, Huh?

Nationally, the majority elect the President to head the executive branch. States, hold elections so the majority can elect representatives to advocate their interests in the legislative branch. The judicial branch resolves interpretation issues.

It’s only complicated when special interests are able to buy a seat in one of the three and hold the system hostage to a limited interest.

Posted from Blogium for iPhone